Baldwin Seeks to Speed Ratification of Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)

Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) chose today, International Women’s Day, to introduce legislation to speed ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the Constitution.

“The ERA is intended to ensure equality for women and men in all areas of society,” said Baldwin. “It is an immediate and decisive remedy to end sex discrimination in federal and state laws and provides a clear benchmark for judicial interpretation. Achieving equality and justice for all in the United States is fundamental to our democratic principles, economic recovery, and continued leadership around the world. The intent of my resolution is simple: a path to equality for all Americans,” Baldwin said.

When Congress passed the ERA in 1972, it provided that the measure be ratified by the necessary number of states (38) within 7 years. This deadline was later extended to 10 years, and, by 1982, 35 states had ratified the ERA. That left the ERA just three states shy of full ratification when the deadline passed in 1982.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia recently stated his belief that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex. Baldwin’s legislation removes the deadline for ratification and clarifies that upon ratification by three additional states, the Equal Rights Amendment will be added to the United States Constitution.

The Madison Amendment, ratified in 1992, 203 years after its initial submission, suggests that the ERA remains legally viable and properly before the remaining states for ratification. Furthermore, the 1978 ERA deadline extension demonstrates that Congress can amend previously established deadlines.

“With women comprising more than 50% of the workforce and serving this country on the fronts of two wars, it is time to end the discrimination based on sex that women still face in the United States,” said Jean Landweber, Wisconsin ERA Chair, United 4Equality. “I am proud of my Representative, Tammy Baldwin, for introducing this legislation to remove the arbitrary time limit that was imposed in1972 for ratification of the ERA. The time is right to achieve equality of rights by finishing what the brave women of the ‘70s started,” Landweber said.

Baldwin’s bill is endorsed by United 4 Equality, LLC; National Council of Women’s Organizations; National Organization for Women; American Association of University Women; Women’s Research and Education Institute (WREI); National Women’s Political Caucus; Equal Rights Alliance, Inc.; ERA Education Fund, Inc.; Federally Employed Women (FEW); National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund; Katrina’s Dream; Clearinghouse on Women’s Issues; JWPOLICY Associates; Progressive Democrats of America (PDA); One Struggle One Fight; Louisiana Coalition for the Equal Rights Amendment; Louisiana Federation of Business and Professional Women (BPW/LA); American Association of University Women of Louisiana (AAUW Louisiana); Louisiana League of Women Voters (LLWV); The Louisiana Movement; Louisiana NOW; Planned Parenthood of Louisiana & Mississippi Delta; The Louisiana Network; Equal Rights Amendment North Carolina Citizens Task Force; Montgomery County chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW); Pacific Shore NOW; ERA Once and For All.

States whose legislatures have not yet ratified the ERA are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia.

Advocates to Rally for ERA 1/6/11

The National Organization for Women

We Hope You’ll Join Us At This Important Event Tomorrow 1/6/11!

Women’s Rights Advocates Demand U.S. Constitution Guarantee Women’s Rights

While Republicans are reading the U.S. Constitution on the floor of the House of Representatives, women’s rights advocates will be outside the Capitol asking: Where are the women?

“John Boehner and his cronies are holding up the U.S. Constitution as a sacred, perfect document. But we know the Constitution is far from perfect because it does not guarantee women’s equality,” says NOW President Terry O’Neill. “I am honored to join Representative Carolyn Maloney, who has been a tireless advocate on Capitol Hill for women’s rights, to highlight the fact that women still are not fully protected in our nation’s Constitution.”

Who:

 

Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.)
Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) – invited
Senator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.)
NOW President Terry O’Neill and leaders from a broad range of women’s rights organizations
What: Call for Equal Rights Amendment to U.S. Constitution
When: January 6, 11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Where: House triangle, outside the Capitol at 1st St. SE and Independence Avenue

“We are way past due for a constitutional amendment explicitly acknowledging women’s rights in the United States,” says O’Neill. “Nothing less will do, as long as sexists like Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia feel completely justified interpreting women’s rights as unprotected in the U.S. Constitution.”

15 states have yet to ratify the ERA. We only need 3.

‎We’re working to end “Jane Crow” in the USA. Join us by helping us ratify the Equal Rights Amendment by 2015 through the 3 states strategy. Help us make legally-imposed sexism a thing of the past. We want 1,111 members of United for Equality on Facebook by 1/1/11! So if you haven’t yet, “like” it, “share” it, and “recommend” it to all your friends. We have 5 years to get 3 states to make 1 law for all. http://www.facebook.com/UnitedForEquality

Why the ERA Remains Legally Viable and Properly Before the States

From Equalrightsamendment.org

The Equal Rights Amendment, passed by Congress in 1972, would have become the 27th Amendment to the Constitution if three-fourths of the states had ratified it by June 30, 1982. However, that date passed with only 35 of the necessary 38 state ratifications. Instead, the 27th Amendment is the “Madison Amendment,” concerning Congressional pay raises, which went to the states for ratification in 1789 and reached the three-fourths goal in 1992.

The fact that a 203-year ratification period was accepted as valid has led ERA supporters to propose that Congress has the power to maintain the legal viability of the ERA and the existing 35 state ratifications. If so, only three more state ratifications would be needed to make the ERA part of the Constitution. Legal analysis supporting this strategy was developed in 1995 by Allison Held, Sheryl Herndon and Danielle Stager, then third-year law students at the T. C. Williams School of Law in Richmond, VA. Their article, “Why the ERA Remains Legally Viable and Properly Before the States,” was published in the Spring 1997 issue of William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law. Continue reading

WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY RALLY IN DC

WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY RALLY IN DC
Rally followed by candlelight walk at dark

6:30 pm-9:30 pm Thursday, August 26th, 2010
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue @ White House
(Metro Center or McPherson Square stations)

For more information or to RSVP, e-mail: info@united4equality.com

Honor the collective power of Sisterhood on the 90th Anniversary of Women’s Suffrage. Bring a sign, a candle and a friend or relative. Join the Alliance to achieve full legal, political and social rights for every woman & girl by 2015!

Women and girls remain 2nd class citizens (with limited rights) in the US today because sex discrimination has not yet been outlawed under the US Constitution. When Government classifies individuals according to stereotypes about their roles and capabilities, it limits one’s ability to develop to one’s full potential.

Stand with us on August 26th to call for President & Michele Obama, Democrats, Republicans and Independents to eliminate the economic, political and social disparities that legalized sex discrimination has caused in our society. Ratify ERA by 2015!

Hosted by: United for Equality, Responsible for Equality and Liberty (REAL), Montgomery Country Maryland Chapter of the National Organization for Women, Louisiana ERA Coalition.

“We the People” includes Women as well as Men

As a man, I find it shocking and disgraceful that half the people in our nation lack full, fair equality under the law. Simply because they are women, millions and millions of Americans–our mothers, sisters, and daughters–live as second-class citizens. I cannot imagine any excuse or explanation which could justify this blatant discrimination. To paraphrase Lincoln, we cannot survive as a house half equal and half unequal. It’s not acceptable. [Continued]

Can the ERA pass? Yes–Only 3 States Needed!

  1. Legal Basis of the “Three State Strategy”
  2. Library of Congress Analyzes Three-State Strategy
  3. Why the ERA Remains Legally Viable and Properly Before the States

by A.Held, S.Herndon, D. Stager published in the Spring 1997 issue of William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law

The Equal Rights Amendment, passed by Congress in 1972, would have become the 27th Amendment to the Constitution if three-fourths of the states had ratified it by June 30, 1982. However, that date passed with only 35 of the necessary 38 state ratifications. Instead, the 27th Amendment is the “Madison Amendment,” concerning Congressional pay raises, which went to the states for ratification in 1789 and reached the three-fourths goal in 1992.

The fact that a 203-year ratification period was accepted as valid has led ERA supporters to propose that Congress has the power to maintain the legal viability of the ERA and the existing 35 state ratifications. If so, only three more state ratifications would be needed to make the ERA part of the Constitution. Legal analysis supporting this strategy was developed in 1995 by Allison Held, Sheryl Herndon and Danielle Stager, then third-year law students at the T. C. Williams School of Law in Richmond, VA. Their article was published in the Spring 1997 issue of William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law.

LEGAL RATIONALE
Article V of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to propose an amendment and to determine the mode of ratification, but it is silent as to the power of Congress to impose time limits or its role after ratification by three-fourths of the states.

Continued: http://www.4era.org/threestate.html